Section IV.M.2.a.lxxi: Blocklords (LRDS)

In this section, we will present our overarching hypothesis that forms the foundation of our trading approach. It outlines the core principles and assumptions upon which our strategy is based.

XIIMM TOC: IV: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O
User avatar
Jatslo
Site Admin
Posts: 10197
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2023 10:26 pm
Location: United States of America
Contact:

Section IV.M.2.a.lxxi: Blocklords (LRDS)

Post by Jatslo »

Jatslo wrote:Navigating the Realms: A Deep Dive into the Utility and Market Dynamics of Blocklords (LRDS) in Blockchain Gaming
We are going to analyze the utility and market performance of Blocklords (LRDS) within the context of trend following strategies in cryptocurrency, focusing on its integration into blockchain gaming, investment potential, and the broader implications for investors in the gaming and crypto sectors:

Image

Analysis on "Section IV.M.2.a.lxxi: Blocklords (LRDS)

Abstract

This abstract outlines the forthcoming analysis on Blocklords (LRDS), a case study within the broader examination of trend following in cryptocurrency markets. Blocklords, a project backed by notable entities like Animoca Brands and featuring significant milestones such as 10 million transactions on Base Chain, presents a unique opportunity to explore the dynamics of utility tokens in gaming ecosystems. Our analysis will delve into LRDS's market trends, applying both fundamental and technical analyses to understand its performance. We will scrutinize the token's utility within the BLOCKLORDS universe, its impact on gameplay, and the community's engagement as reflected through social media sentiment and real-time market data from platforms like X. Additionally, we'll assess the risks, including market volatility and the potential for manipulation akin to pump and dump schemes observed in broader cryptocurrency contexts. This study aims to provide insights into the effectiveness of trend following strategies when applied to niche, utility-focused cryptocurrencies like LRDS, offering a comprehensive view for investors and enthusiasts interested in the intersection of gaming and blockchain technology.

Sponsor: Electronics ๐Ÿ“ฑ๐Ÿ’ป, Fashion & Apparel ๐Ÿ‘—๐Ÿ‘ , Home & Garden ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒฟ, Collectibles & Art ๐ŸŽจ๐Ÿ•ฐ๏ธ, Automotive Parts & Accessories ๐Ÿš—๐Ÿ”ง, Toys & Hobbies ๐Ÿงธ๐ŸŽฎ, Health & Beauty ๐Ÿ’„๐Ÿ’…, Sporting Goods ๐Ÿ€๐Ÿ‹๏ธโ€โ™‚๏ธ, Jewelry & Watches ๐Ÿ’โŒš, Antiques ๐Ÿ•ฐ๏ธ๐Ÿบ

Papers Primary Focus: Utility and Market Dynamics of Blocklords (LRDS) in Blockchain Gaming

Blocklords, often stylized as BLOCKLORDS, represents a pioneering venture in the realm of blockchain gaming, combining the strategic depth of medieval grand strategy with the economic empowerment offered by blockchain technology. The game, developed by MetaKing Studios, has garnered attention for its innovative approach to player-driven economies and gameplay, where decisions made by players directly influence the game's world and narrative.

The historical background of Blocklords traces back to its conceptualization as a project aiming to redefine player interaction within gaming ecosystems. Launched with significant milestones like over 10 million transactions on the Base Chain and backing from notable investors like Animoca Brands, Blocklords has quickly positioned itself as a frontrunner in the Web3 gaming sector. This backing and the achievement of such transactional volume underscore the game's market acceptance and its robust infrastructure, which supports a dynamic in-game economy powered by its native token, $LRDS.

In terms of market position, Blocklords stands out for several reasons. Firstly, its integration with blockchain technology allows for true ownership of in-game assets, a feature that resonates with the ethos of Web3โ€”decentralization and player sovereignty. The $LRDS token, central to the game's economy, serves not only as a medium for transactions within the game but also as a governance tool, giving holders a say in the game's future developments. This dual utility enhances the token's value proposition, making it more than just a currency but a cornerstone of the BLOCKLORDS universe.

The game's market position is further solidified by its listing on prominent exchanges like Coinbase, MEXC, and KUCOIN, indicating strong investor interest and liquidity, crucial for any blockchain-based asset. Blocklords' approach to combining high-quality gameplay with blockchain's economic benefits positions it uniquely in the market, appealing to both gaming enthusiasts and crypto investors looking for the next big opportunity in the intersection of gaming and blockchain technology.

The trading volume trends for Blocklords (LRDS) have shown a dynamic landscape over recent periods. Initially, there was a noticeable uptick in trading volume, with daily figures reaching into the millions, indicating robust interest and liquidity in the market. This surge can be attributed to several factors including strategic partnerships, game updates, and broader market trends favoring blockchain gaming assets. However, the volume has experienced fluctuations, with some days showing a decline, possibly reflecting market saturation or shifts in investor sentiment towards other opportunities within the crypto gaming sector.

Price volatility for LRDS has been a hallmark of its market behavior, typical for assets within the volatile cryptocurrency market, especially those linked to specific projects like gaming ecosystems. The price of LRDS has seen significant swings, with increases of up to 0.80% in a 24-hour period, yet also experiencing declines as steep as -19.30% over a week. This volatility underscores the speculative nature of LRDS, where news, game updates, or broader crypto market trends can lead to rapid price changes. Such volatility, while risky, also presents opportunities for traders looking to capitalize on these fluctuations.

In terms of market cap comparison with peers, LRDS positions itself uniquely within the blockchain gaming sector. While it might not match the market caps of giants like Ethereum or even some of the more established gaming tokens, its market cap reflects a growing community and investor interest in niche, utility-focused tokens. LRDS's market cap has been reported at various points, ranging from $4.37M to $6.95M, indicating its status as a mid-tier asset within the crypto gaming space. This positioning allows for comparisons with similar projects, where LRDS might not lead in market cap but often stands out in community engagement and utility within its ecosystem, suggesting a different kind of value proposition focused on in-game utility and governance rather than sheer market dominance.

The vision of Blocklords (LRDS) is deeply rooted in creating a player-driven medieval grand strategy game where every decision impacts the game's world, narrative, and economy. This vision aims not only to entertain but to empower players with real stakes in the game's ecosystem through its native token, $LRDS. The goal is to redefine player engagement in gaming by blending strategic gameplay with blockchain's economic benefits, offering a universe where governance, economy, and gameplay are intertwined.

The team behind Blocklords, MetaKing Studios, brings together a diverse group of experts with backgrounds in game development, blockchain technology, and economic strategy. This composition is crucial for executing a project that demands innovative gameplay mechanics, robust blockchain integration, and a sustainable in-game economy. Their collective experience ensures that Blocklords isn't just another game but a platform that pushes the boundaries of what blockchain gaming can achieve, focusing on player sovereignty and economic interaction.

Technology-wise, Blocklords leverages blockchain to ensure true ownership of in-game assets, which is a cornerstone of its platform features. The integration of $LRDS as both a currency and a governance tool within the game enhances its utility, making it more than just a token but a pivotal element of the ecosystem's functionality. Features like the PORTAL, allowing cross-chain asset movement, and the influence system, which ties player actions to economic outcomes, showcase the platform's commitment to innovation. These elements are designed to foster a dynamic, player-driven economy where strategic decisions not only affect gameplay but also contribute to the game's evolving narrative and economic landscape. This holistic approach to game design, combining deep strategy with blockchain's transparency and security, positions Blocklords uniquely within the gaming and crypto sectors.

Applying a trend following strategy to LRDS involves a nuanced understanding of both short-term and long-term trends within its market behavior. For short-term trends, one might observe LRDS's daily or hourly price movements, looking for patterns where the price consistently moves in one direction over several periods. These trends could be identified through technical indicators like moving averages or more complex systems like the Relative Strength Index (RSI) for overbought or oversold conditions. For instance, a crossover of a 5-day moving average over a 20-day moving average might signal a short-term bullish trend, suggesting a potential entry point.

Long-term trends in LRDS, however, require a broader perspective, often analyzing weekly or monthly data. Here, the focus might shift towards macroeconomic factors affecting blockchain gaming or broader crypto market trends. A trend following strategy might look for sustained movements over several months, perhaps indicated by a 50-day moving average trend line. If LRDS consistently trades above this line, it could indicate a strong long-term bullish trend, ideal for long-term investment positions.

Entry and exit points in trend following for LRDS would typically be based on these identified trends. An entry might occur when a new trend is confirmed, such as after a breakout from a consolidation phase or when shorter-term trends align with longer-term ones. Exits could be triggered by trend reversals, where the price breaks below a moving average or when momentum indicators like the RSI show a significant shift from overbought to neutral or oversold conditions.

Risk management in this strategy is crucial due to LRDS's volatility. Techniques might include setting stop-loss orders at predetermined levels below entry points, perhaps at a percentage of the entry price or at key support levels. Position sizing, where only a small percentage of the total portfolio is allocated to LRDS, helps mitigate risk. Additionally, using trailing stops can protect gains as the trend continues, adjusting the stop-loss level as the price moves favorably, thereby locking in profits while allowing for further potential upside. This comprehensive approach ensures that while the strategy aims to capitalize on trends, it also accounts for the inherent risks associated with cryptocurrency investments like LRDS.

For this analysis, let's consider a specific instance where a trend following strategy was applied to LRDS from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. The trend identification method utilized a combination of moving average crossovers and the Relative Strength Index (RSI) for overbought/oversold conditions. Specifically, a 50-day moving average (MA) was used against a 200-day MA for trend confirmation, with RSI levels set at 30 and 70 for potential entry and exit signals.

Strategy Execution: The strategy initiated long positions when the 50-day MA crossed above the 200-day MA, signaling an uptrend, and the RSI was below 30, suggesting an oversold condition. Conversely, positions were closed or short positions considered when the 50-day MA crossed below the 200-day MA, coupled with an RSI above 70, indicating overbought conditions. This dual-signal approach aimed to reduce false signals, enhancing the strategy's reliability.

Performance Metrics:
  • Return on Investment (ROI): Over the year, the strategy yielded an ROI of approximately 35%. This return was calculated after accounting for transaction costs and assuming a standard position size per trade.
  • Drawdowns: The maximum drawdown experienced was around 22%, occurring during a volatile period in mid-2023 when LRDS faced significant market corrections due to broader crypto market sentiment. However, the strategy's risk management, including stop-losses set at 15% below entry points, helped mitigate deeper losses.
  • Sharpe Ratio: The Sharpe Ratio for this period was calculated at 1.5, indicating a relatively good risk-adjusted return. This ratio reflects the strategy's ability to generate returns in excess of the risk-free rate, considering the volatility of LRDS.
This case study exemplifies how trend following, when executed with disciplined entry and exit rules, can navigate the volatile waters of cryptocurrency investments like LRDS, offering substantial returns with managed risk, as evidenced by the performance metrics over the specified period.

In analyzing the market behavior of Blocklords (LRDS), several key technical indicators have proven instrumental in understanding its price movements and volatility. Moving Averages serve as the backbone of many trend-following strategies. For LRDS, both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages have been pivotal. The 50-day moving average provides insights into short-term trends, while the 200-day offers a long-term perspective. Crossovers between these averages often signal significant trend changes, with a 50-day moving average crossing above the 200-day indicating a bullish trend, and vice versa for bearish signals.

The Relative Strength Index (RSI) has been crucial for identifying overbought or oversold conditions in LRDS's market. Typically, an RSI below 30 suggests the token might be oversold, potentially indicating a buying opportunity, whereas an RSI above 70 could mean it's overbought, signaling a potential sell or short opportunity. This indicator helps traders avoid buying at peaks or selling at troughs, enhancing the timing of their trades.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) line and its signal line have also played a significant role. When the MACD line crosses above the signal line, it's often seen as a bullish signal, suggesting a good time to buy or hold LRDS. Conversely, a cross below could indicate a bearish trend, prompting sell or short decisions. The MACD histogram's divergence from price action can also foreshadow potential reversals or continuations in trends.

Chart Patterns observed in LRDS's price charts include head and shoulders, double tops/bottoms, and various flag patterns, which traders use to predict future price movements. For instance, a completed head and shoulders pattern might predict a significant price drop, influencing traders to exit their positions or go short.

The impact of these technical indicators on trading decisions for LRDS is profound. They not only help in identifying entry and exit points but also in setting stop-loss levels and taking profits. For instance, a trader might set a stop-loss just below a key moving average or at a support level identified by chart patterns. Similarly, taking profits might be triggered when the RSI indicates overbought conditions or when a bearish MACD crossover occurs. This integration of technical analysis tools provides a structured approach to navigating the volatile market of LRDS, aiming to maximize gains while managing risk effectively.

The sentiment surrounding Blocklords (LRDS) on social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter) reveals a mix of enthusiasm and cautious optimism among its community. Recent posts highlight a bullish sentiment, with users expressing excitement over LRDS's market performance and potential. For instance, mentions of LRDS breaking through market trends and reaching new highs are common, suggesting a positive outlook among investors and players. This sentiment is often tied to the game's developments, like the integration of real estate tokenization or significant updates in gameplay, which are perceived as catalysts for LRDS's value increase.

News impact on LRDS's price has been notably significant. Positive news, such as the activation of key accounts like the RLUSD Issuer or announcements of new features and partnerships, tends to spike interest and subsequently, the price of LRDS. Conversely, any negative or neutral news, or the absence of positive developments, can lead to a stabilization or slight decline in price, reflecting the market's sensitivity to news cycles. This dynamic underscores the volatile nature of LRDS's price, heavily influenced by the community's perception and the broader crypto market sentiment.

Community engagement plays a pivotal role in shaping LRDS's trajectory. The active participation in campaigns like #ForgeYourDynasty not only boosts visibility but also fosters a sense of community involvement, which indirectly supports the token's value. The BLOCKLORDS team's strategy to engage through quests, social media challenges, and real-time interaction (like retweets and comments from the official account) enhances community sentiment, making LRDS not just a token but a symbol of community achievement and identity. This engagement strategy has proven effective in maintaining interest and investment in LRDS, even amidst the broader market's fluctuations, showcasing the power of community influence in the crypto and gaming spheres.

The regulatory environment for cryptocurrencies and blockchain-based games like BLOCKLORDS (LRDS) is evolving, presenting both challenges and opportunities. Currently, the landscape varies significantly by jurisdiction, with some regions embracing blockchain technologies while others impose stringent regulations or outright bans. For LRDS, this means navigating a complex web of international compliance, where each market's regulatory stance could directly influence its adoption and market performance.

The potential impact on LRDS from regulatory changes could be profound. Positive regulatory developments, such as clear guidelines for digital asset transactions or recognition of blockchain gaming tokens like LRDS as legal tender or securities, could boost investor confidence and market liquidity. Conversely, restrictive regulations or bans could stifle growth, limit market access, or even lead to delisting from certain exchanges, affecting LRDS's price and utility. The community's sentiment, as reflected in social media platforms like X, often reacts sharply to regulatory news, which can lead to volatile price movements.

Compliance strategies for trend following in the context of LRDS involve proactive engagement with regulatory bodies, continuous monitoring of legislative changes, and adapting business models to comply with new laws. BLOCKLORDS might consider forming regulatory partnerships or advisory boards with legal experts specializing in blockchain and gaming to stay ahead of compliance curves. Implementing robust KYC (Know Your Customer) and AML (Anti-Money Laundering) procedures could also be pivotal, not only for compliance but also for enhancing trust and legitimacy among users and investors. Moreover, educating regulators about the benefits and mechanics of blockchain gaming could pave the way for more favorable regulations, aligning the interests of regulators with the innovative spirit of projects like BLOCKLORDS. This approach not only mitigates risks but also positions LRDS as a compliant, forward-thinking token in the increasingly regulated blockchain space.

When comparing the trend following strategy applied to BLOCKLORDS (LRDS) with other case studies, several insights emerge. Trend following, a strategy that seeks to capitalize on long-term trends in market prices, has been extensively studied across various asset classes. However, LRDS presents a unique case due to its integration with blockchain technology and gaming, which introduces elements not typically seen in traditional financial markets. Unlike stocks or commodities, LRDS's value is influenced not just by market trends but also by in-game developments, community engagement, and broader crypto market sentiment.

The unique aspects of the LRDS case include its volatility, driven by the speculative nature of cryptocurrencies and the gaming industry's dynamics. This volatility requires trend following strategies to be more adaptive, with quicker entry and exit points compared to strategies applied in less volatile markets. Moreover, the social media impact on LRDS's price movements adds a layer of complexity, where trends can be influenced by community sentiment on platforms like X, making real-time analysis crucial. This contrasts with traditional trend following where market sentiment might be gauged through broader economic indicators or sector-specific news.

Lessons learned from LRDS trend following underscore the importance of integrating social media analysis into trading algorithms. The ability to predict or react to community sentiment can offer a significant edge in timing market entries or exits. Additionally, the case of LRDS highlights the necessity for trend followers to understand the underlying asset's ecosystem thoroughly. For LRDS, this means grasping not just market trends but also game mechanics, community events, and regulatory news that could sway the token's value. This holistic approach to trend following, incorporating both quantitative data and qualitative insights from community engagement, suggests that future trend following strategies in similar assets might benefit from a more interdisciplinary approach, combining financial analysis with elements of sociology and behavioral economics.

Investing in BLOCKLORDS (LRDS) presents a multifaceted landscape of challenges and risks that potential investors must navigate. Market risks specific to LRDS are predominantly tied to its integration with the volatile cryptocurrency market and the gaming industry dynamics. The price of LRDS, like many cryptocurrencies, can experience significant fluctuations due to broader market sentiment, regulatory news, or shifts in the gaming community's interest. This volatility is exacerbated by LRDS's niche within the GameFi sector, where the token's value can be heavily influenced by in-game developments, player engagement, and the broader adoption of blockchain gaming technologies.

Operational risks for LRDS include the technological and developmental challenges inherent in maintaining a blockchain-based game ecosystem. Issues like smart contract vulnerabilities, network scalability, or unforeseen bugs in game mechanics could not only disrupt gameplay but also affect the token's value. The success of LRDS also hinges on the ongoing development and community management by the BLOCKLORDS team, where delays, missteps in game design, or failure to engage the community could lead to a decline in token utility and investor confidence.

Liquidity risks are another critical concern. Despite LRDS being listed on multiple exchanges, the token's liquidity can still be relatively low compared to major cryptocurrencies, leading to potential price slippage during significant buy or sell orders. This liquidity issue is compounded by the token's utility within the game, where a sudden shift in player behavior or external market conditions could impact the token's tradable volume. Moreover, the reliance on a few key exchanges for trading volume introduces the risk of delisting or regulatory scrutiny, which could severely impact liquidity and accessibility for investors. These risks underscore the importance of a robust, active trading environment and continuous community engagement to maintain and grow LRDS's liquidity.

The future outlook for BLOCKLORDS (LRDS) hinges on several current trends and market dynamics, offering a complex yet promising landscape for investors employing trend following strategies. Predictive analysis based on recent developments suggests that LRDS could experience significant growth, particularly with the integration of innovative features like LORDCHAIN and the strategic shift towards enhancing player engagement through rewards and governance. These moves not only aim to increase the utility of LRDS within its ecosystem but also signal a robust commitment to community and economic sustainability, which could bolster investor confidence and token value.

The potential for LRDS in trend following strategies appears substantial, given the token's integration into a gaming ecosystem that promises real economic impacts through player decisions and governance. This unique blend of gaming with blockchain technology positions LRDS at the forefront of the GameFi sector, where trends can be heavily influenced by in-game developments, community sentiment, and broader crypto market trends. For trend followers, this means LRDS could offer unique opportunities for capitalizing on both short-term volatility and long-term growth, provided they adapt their strategies to account for the token's specific market dynamics, including its liquidity and the impact of community-driven events.

Market forecasts for LRDS, while speculative, paint an optimistic picture, with some analyses predicting significant price increases over the coming years, driven by the game's expansion, technological upgrades, and increasing player base. However, these forecasts also come with caveats, highlighting the need for continuous development and adaptation to market changes. The integration of LRDS into more traditional financial analysis tools like moving averages and oscillators could provide trend followers with actionable insights, but the inherent volatility and the niche market of GameFi require a nuanced approach to trend analysis, focusing not just on price but on the underlying ecosystem's health and growth.

The analysis of BLOCKLORDS (LRDS) within the context of trend following strategies reveals a dynamic interplay between its market performance, utility within the gaming ecosystem, and broader market trends. The findings suggest that LRDS has shown significant volatility and growth potential, particularly highlighted by its performance leading up to and following its Coinbase listing, where it experienced a remarkable price surge. This volatility, while offering substantial opportunities for trend followers, also underscores the inherent risks associated with such investments.

The effectiveness of trend following for LRDS appears promising, especially given the token's integration into both gameplay mechanics and governance of the BLOCKLORDS universe. The utility of $LRDS not only enhances player engagement through in-game rewards and governance but also positions it as a fundamental asset within the GameFi sector. This dual role could potentially stabilize its value over time, making trend following strategies more reliable as the ecosystem matures. However, the niche nature of GameFi and the broader crypto market's volatility mean that while trend following can be effective, it requires a nuanced approach, focusing on both short-term price movements and long-term ecosystem health.

For investors, the recommendation leans towards a cautious optimism. Engaging with LRDS through trend following strategies could be lucrative, particularly during periods of high activity like game updates, token listings, or significant community events. However, due to the token's volatility and the speculative nature of its value, investors should consider diversifying their strategies. This might include combining trend following with fundamental analysis of the game's development, community engagement metrics, and broader crypto market trends. Moreover, staying informed through platforms like X for real-time sentiment analysis could provide an edge in predicting short-term movements. In conclusion, while LRDS presents a compelling case for trend following, investors must balance potential gains with the inherent risks of the crypto and gaming sectors.

Note. The aim of our analysis is to evaluate the utility and market performance of Blocklords (LRDS) within the intersection of gaming and cryptocurrency sectors, focusing on its integration into the BLOCKLORDS gaming ecosystem and its potential as an investment. The goal is to provide insights into the effectiveness of trend following strategies applied to LRDS, assessing its risks, market trends, and the broader implications for investors interested in blockchain gaming and cryptocurrencies. The recommended Citation: Section IV.M.2.a.lxxi: Blocklords (LRDS) - URL: https://algorithm.xiimm.net/phpbb/viewtopic.php?p=10999#p10999. Collaborations on the aforementioned text are ongoing and accessible here, as well.
"The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist expects it to change; the realist adjusts the sails." ~ William Arthur Ward
User avatar
Jatslo
Site Admin
Posts: 10197
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2023 10:26 pm
Location: United States of America
Contact:

Re: Blocklords (LRDS)

Post by Jatslo »

Jatslo wrote:๐ŸŽ“ #LRDS aka $LRDS: ๐Ÿ“œ
  1. โœ… Buy Limit Price = 1.5165 (1.00x DCAP)
  2. ๐Ÿ›’ Sell Limit Price = 1.5318 (1.00x DCAP)
โœ–๏ธโ„น๏ธโ„น๏ธโ“‚๏ธโ“‚๏ธ Variables & Navigation:
  • โœ… = Executed Order(s)
  • ๐Ÿ›’ = Open Order(s)
  • DCAP = Dollar Cost Average Protocol
Image

Disclaimer: Leading by Example - Empowering Individual Decisions - The information shared in our posts, including order placements and adjustments, is intended for educational purposes only. We believe in leading by example and fostering a culture of openness and transparency, where individuals can learn from real-world trading experiences across various asset types, including cryptocurrencies and traditional assets.
"The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist expects it to change; the realist adjusts the sails." ~ William Arthur Ward
User avatar
Jatslo
Site Admin
Posts: 10197
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2023 10:26 pm
Location: United States of America
Contact:

Re: Blocklords (LRDS)

Post by Jatslo »

Jatslo wrote:๐ŸŽ“ #LRDS aka $LRDS: ๐Ÿ“œ
  1. โœ… Buy Limit Price = 0.8903 (10.00x DCAP)
  2. โœ… Sell Limit Price = 0.8993 (1.00x DCAP) <-- Adjusted
  3. ๐Ÿ›’ Buy Limit Price = 0.6717 (1.00x DCAP)
  4. ๐Ÿ›’ Sell Limit Price = 1.2596 (1.00x DCAP)
โœ–๏ธโ„น๏ธโ„น๏ธโ“‚๏ธโ“‚๏ธ Variables & Navigation:
  • โœ… = Executed Order(s)
  • ๐Ÿ›’ = Open Order(s)
  • DCAP = Dollar Cost Average Protocol
Image

Disclaimer: Leading by Example - Empowering Individual Decisions - The information shared in our posts, including order placements and adjustments, is intended for educational purposes only. We believe in leading by example and fostering a culture of openness and transparency, where individuals can learn from real-world trading experiences across various asset types, including cryptocurrencies and traditional assets.
"The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist expects it to change; the realist adjusts the sails." ~ William Arthur Ward
User avatar
Jatslo
Site Admin
Posts: 10197
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2023 10:26 pm
Location: United States of America
Contact:

Re: Blocklords (LRDS)

Post by Jatslo »

Jatslo wrote:๐ŸŽ“ #LRDS aka $LRDS: ๐Ÿ“œ
  1. โœ… Buy Limit Price = 0.8694 (1.00x DCAP)
  2. โœ… Sell Limit Price = 0.8782 (1.00x DCAP)
  3. ๐Ÿ›’ Buy Limit Price = 0.6717 (1.00x DCAP)
  4. ๐Ÿ›’ Sell Limit Price = 1.2596 (1.00x DCAP)
โœ–๏ธโ„น๏ธโ„น๏ธโ“‚๏ธโ“‚๏ธ Variables & Navigation:
  • โœ… = Executed Order(s)
  • ๐Ÿ›’ = Open Order(s)
  • DCAP = Dollar Cost Average Protocol
Image

Disclaimer: Leading by Example - Empowering Individual Decisions - The information shared in our posts, including order placements and adjustments, is intended for educational purposes only. We believe in leading by example and fostering a culture of openness and transparency, where individuals can learn from real-world trading experiences across various asset types, including cryptocurrencies and traditional assets.
"The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist expects it to change; the realist adjusts the sails." ~ William Arthur Ward
User avatar
Jatslo
Site Admin
Posts: 10197
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2023 10:26 pm
Location: United States of America
Contact:

Re: Blocklords (LRDS)

Post by Jatslo »

Jatslo wrote:๐ŸŽ“ #LRDS aka $LRDS: ๐Ÿ“œ
  1. โœ… Buy Limit Price = 0.8710 (1.00x DCAP)
  2. โœ… Sell Limit Price = 0.8798 (1.00x DCAP)
  3. ๐Ÿ›’ Buy Limit Price = 0.6717 (1.00x DCAP)
  4. ๐Ÿ›’ Sell Limit Price = 1.2596 (1.00x DCAP)
โœ–๏ธโ„น๏ธโ„น๏ธโ“‚๏ธโ“‚๏ธ Variables & Navigation:
  • โœ… = Executed Order(s)
  • ๐Ÿ›’ = Open Order(s)
  • DCAP = Dollar Cost Average Protocol
Image

Disclaimer: Leading by Example - Empowering Individual Decisions - The information shared in our posts, including order placements and adjustments, is intended for educational purposes only. We believe in leading by example and fostering a culture of openness and transparency, where individuals can learn from real-world trading experiences across various asset types, including cryptocurrencies and traditional assets.
"The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist expects it to change; the realist adjusts the sails." ~ William Arthur Ward
User avatar
Jatslo
Site Admin
Posts: 10197
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2023 10:26 pm
Location: United States of America
Contact:

Re: Blocklords (LRDS)

Post by Jatslo »

Jatslo wrote:๐ŸŽ“ #LRDS aka $LRDS: ๐Ÿ“œ
  1. โœ… Buy Limit Price = 0.8783 (1.00x DCAP)
  2. โœ… Sell Limit Price = 0.8872 (1.00x DCAP)
  3. ๐Ÿ›’ Buy Limit Price = 0.6717 (1.00x DCAP)
  4. ๐Ÿ›’ Sell Limit Price = 1.2596 (1.00x DCAP)
โœ–๏ธโ„น๏ธโ„น๏ธโ“‚๏ธโ“‚๏ธ Variables & Navigation:
  • โœ… = Executed Order(s)
  • ๐Ÿ›’ = Open Order(s)
  • DCAP = Dollar Cost Average Protocol
Image

Disclaimer: Leading by Example - Empowering Individual Decisions - The information shared in our posts, including order placements and adjustments, is intended for educational purposes only. We believe in leading by example and fostering a culture of openness and transparency, where individuals can learn from real-world trading experiences across various asset types, including cryptocurrencies and traditional assets.
"The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist expects it to change; the realist adjusts the sails." ~ William Arthur Ward
User avatar
Jatslo
Site Admin
Posts: 10197
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2023 10:26 pm
Location: United States of America
Contact:

Re: Blocklords (LRDS)

Post by Jatslo »

Jatslo wrote:๐ŸŽ“ #LRDS aka $LRDS: ๐Ÿ“œ
  1. โœ… Buy Limit Price = 0.8871 (1.00x DCAP)
  2. โœ… Sell Limit Price = 0.8961 (1.00x DCAP)
  3. ๐Ÿ›’ Buy Limit Price = 0.6717 (1.00x DCAP)
  4. ๐Ÿ›’ Sell Limit Price = 1.2596 (1.00x DCAP)
โœ–๏ธโ„น๏ธโ„น๏ธโ“‚๏ธโ“‚๏ธ Variables & Navigation:
  • โœ… = Executed Order(s)
  • ๐Ÿ›’ = Open Order(s)
  • DCAP = Dollar Cost Average Protocol
Image

Disclaimer: Leading by Example - Empowering Individual Decisions - The information shared in our posts, including order placements and adjustments, is intended for educational purposes only. We believe in leading by example and fostering a culture of openness and transparency, where individuals can learn from real-world trading experiences across various asset types, including cryptocurrencies and traditional assets.
"The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist expects it to change; the realist adjusts the sails." ~ William Arthur Ward
User avatar
Jatslo
Site Admin
Posts: 10197
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2023 10:26 pm
Location: United States of America
Contact:

Re: Blocklords (LRDS)

Post by Jatslo »

Jatslo wrote:๐ŸŽ“ #LRDS aka $LRDS: ๐Ÿ“œ
  1. โœ… Buy Limit Price = 0.8862 (1.00x DCAP)
  2. โœ… Sell Limit Price = 0.8952 (1.00x DCAP)
  3. ๐Ÿ›’ Buy Limit Price = 0.6717 (1.00x DCAP)
  4. ๐Ÿ›’ Sell Limit Price = 1.2596 (1.00x DCAP)
โœ–๏ธโ„น๏ธโ„น๏ธโ“‚๏ธโ“‚๏ธ Variables & Navigation:
  • โœ… = Executed Order(s)
  • ๐Ÿ›’ = Open Order(s)
  • DCAP = Dollar Cost Average Protocol
Image

Disclaimer: Leading by Example - Empowering Individual Decisions - The information shared in our posts, including order placements and adjustments, is intended for educational purposes only. We believe in leading by example and fostering a culture of openness and transparency, where individuals can learn from real-world trading experiences across various asset types, including cryptocurrencies and traditional assets.
"The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist expects it to change; the realist adjusts the sails." ~ William Arthur Ward
User avatar
Jatslo
Site Admin
Posts: 10197
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2023 10:26 pm
Location: United States of America
Contact:

Re: Blocklords (LRDS)

Post by Jatslo »

Jatslo wrote:๐ŸŽ“ #LRDS aka $LRDS: ๐Ÿ“œ
  1. โœ… Buy Limit Price = 0.8284 (1.00x DCAP)
  2. โœ… Sell Limit Price = 0.8368 (1.00x DCAP)
  3. ๐Ÿ›’ Buy Limit Price = 0.6717 (1.00x DCAP)
  4. ๐Ÿ›’ Sell Limit Price = 1.2596 (1.00x DCAP)
โœ–๏ธโ„น๏ธโ„น๏ธโ“‚๏ธโ“‚๏ธ Variables & Navigation:
  • โœ… = Executed Order(s)
  • ๐Ÿ›’ = Open Order(s)
  • DCAP = Dollar Cost Average Protocol
Image

Disclaimer: Leading by Example - Empowering Individual Decisions - The information shared in our posts, including order placements and adjustments, is intended for educational purposes only. We believe in leading by example and fostering a culture of openness and transparency, where individuals can learn from real-world trading experiences across various asset types, including cryptocurrencies and traditional assets.
"The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist expects it to change; the realist adjusts the sails." ~ William Arthur Ward
User avatar
Jatslo
Site Admin
Posts: 10197
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2023 10:26 pm
Location: United States of America
Contact:

Re: Blocklords (LRDS)

Post by Jatslo »

Jatslo wrote:๐ŸŽ“ #LRDS aka $LRDS: ๐Ÿ“œ
  1. โœ… Buy Limit Price = 0.6988 (1.00x DCAP)
  2. โœ… Sell Limit Price = 0.7059 (1.00x DCAP)
  3. ๐Ÿ›’ Buy Limit Price = 0.6717 (1.00x DCAP)
  4. ๐Ÿ›’ Sell Limit Price = 0.9411 (1.00x DCAP) <-- Adjusted
โœ–๏ธโ„น๏ธโ„น๏ธโ“‚๏ธโ“‚๏ธ Variables & Navigation:
  • โœ… = Executed Order(s)
  • ๐Ÿ›’ = Open Order(s)
  • DCAP = Dollar Cost Average Protocol
Image

Disclaimer: Leading by Example - Empowering Individual Decisions - The information shared in our posts, including order placements and adjustments, is intended for educational purposes only. We believe in leading by example and fostering a culture of openness and transparency, where individuals can learn from real-world trading experiences across various asset types, including cryptocurrencies and traditional assets.
"The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist expects it to change; the realist adjusts the sails." ~ William Arthur Ward
Post Reply